Safety and Quality Assurance in International Medical Travel

 

Abstract

Medical, health, and wellness tourism have grown rapidly in recent years, driven by globalization, cost disparities, and the increasing pursuit of holistic well-being. However, in regions plagued by local violence and crime, this growth faces significant barriers. This white paper explores the impact of violence and quality assurance on inbound health-related tourism, drawing on recent empirical studies, especially those focused on Latin America, and offers guidance for foreign facility owners and administrators to mitigate risks and preserve trust.

Introduction to Safety & QA in Medical Tourism

Medical and wellness tourism depend on the perception of safety and reliability. Patients and wellness seekers are often vulnerable, requiring assurance not just in medical competence but also in the surrounding environment. Local violence, whether measured in homicides, kidnappings, drug crimes, or media-reported threats, can deter potential visitors and disrupt an otherwise thriving health tourism economy. In a competitive global healthcare market, quality assurance (QA) is not only a regulatory necessity but also a powerful strategic tool for attracting foreign patients. For medical tourists, many of whom travel across borders seeking cost-effective care without compromising on quality, the perception of excellence, safety, and reliability is paramount.

This paper synthesizes findings from a wide range of studies to help health facility stakeholders understand and respond effectively to the risks posed by violence. Similarly, healthcare facilities that implement & institutionalize robust QA programs can significantly enhance their international appeal by signaling credibility, reducing patient uncertainty, and fostering long-term trust.

Introduction to Safety and Medical Tourism

Violence has been found to deter foreign tourism in destinations around the world. Looking at locations in Latin America, such as Rio de Janeiro, each violent death corresponds to roughly 3–4 fewer tourists, and a 1% rise in Brazil’s homicide rate links to about 2,037 fewer visitors. In Mexico, higher homicide counts and increased kidnappings are associated with declines ranging from 0.5% to 7.2% in international arrivals, with one study noting a 30–35% drop in hotel business and a 10.4% decrease at the US–Mexico border. In Colombia, rising kidnapping indices reduce health tourism, and an analysis of dark and movie tourism suggests that some visitors deliberately seek experiences linked to violence.

Studies on medical and health tourism indicate that tourists in Ciudad Juárez perceive a high risk, even when actual incidents are confined away from well-serviced and secure tourist zones. Overall, quantitative evidence from multiple designs (e.g., panel data, regression, and survey analyses) shows that violent incidents and the amplified influence of media and travel alerts lower foreign visitor numbers, although some destinations maintain resilience in visitor stay duration despite these deterrents.

Empirical Evidence: How Violence Affects Health Tourism

For hospital owners and administrators considering participation in the medical tourism industry, particularly in regions with complex security challenges, the case of Mexico offers an instructive, if paradoxical, example (for a complete summary see Vequist, Pulido, & Vequist, In Press). Despite persistent issues with violence, high-profile cartel activity, and the highest volume of U.S. State Department travel advisories globally, Mexico continues to see robust growth in medical tourism. From 2009 through 2024, international arrivals, especially from the United States, have trended upward, even as homicide rates and incidents targeting foreigners have surged. This contradicts the broader international consensus, supported by studies in countries like Jamaica and Barbados, where increases in violence directly suppress tourist activity.

This anomaly appears to stem from several intertwined factors. First, economic interdependence between the U.S. and Mexico, coupled with the substantial cost savings that American patients can obtain for procedures like dental surgery, bariatric care, and cosmetic operations, creates a compelling incentive that often outweighs security concerns. Second, medical tourism in Mexico is largely insulated from general crime through geographic and logistical structuring and because medical tourism facilities are often located in secure urban pockets near borders or airports, where patients spend limited time outside controlled environments. These safe zones, combined with tightly managed patient itineraries and trusted provider networks, reduce exposure to perceived or real threats.

Another critical insight is the localized and temporary nature of crime’s impact on tourism behavior. While incidents, such as the widely publicized 2023 Matamoros kidnapping of American medical tourists, do provoke momentary concern, the broader effect appears to be spatial displacement rather than total withdrawal. Tourists may choose alternative Mexican destinations temporarily but remain within the country. This phenomenon suggests that medical tourists are not necessarily deterred by national-level warnings but make region-specific risk calculations when choosing a provider.

Importantly, the research highlights a disconnect between perceived and actual risk, often amplified by media coverage and travel advisories. While such warnings have devastating effects on tourism in poorer or lesser-known destinations, their influence in Mexico appears muted. Analysts speculate that repeated exposure to advisories and sensational headlines may have led to a kind of “risk normalization,” where travelers adopt defensive behaviors (such as using vetted transport or staying within hospital networks) rather than canceling trips outright. For health facility operators, this underscores the importance of crisis communication, transparent safety measures, and affiliation with internationally recognized accreditation bodies, all of which can counterbalance negative perceptions.

Mexico’s case challenges traditional assumptions that rising crime inevitably diminishes medical tourism. Instead, it highlights the resilience of the sector when supported by strong cross-border economic incentives, strategic infrastructure placement, and differentiated market positioning. For foreign hospital owners seeking to enter or expand within international health tourism markets, especially in regions with safety concerns, these insights offer a roadmap for risk mitigation, patient reassurance, and operational sustainability.

However, the recent research, from a variety of other locations around the world, reveals a consistent pattern: violence has a significant negative effect on all forms of tourism, including medical and health travel. Among the included studies (see the References section at the end of this paper), there is consistent evidence that violence, measured as homicide, crime, or terrorism, deters foreign visitors. Although, effect sizes vary by context and segment, with some studies providing specific estimates (e.g., number of tourists lost per homicide) and others reporting significant or moderate effects without quantification.

Some other examples of the findings in Latin America (which attracts the majority of American medical tourists) include:

• In Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, although the actual risk to tourists in medical zones is low, the perceived risk remains high. Tourists largely stay in well-serviced and secure areas, but this spatial segregation does not eliminate fears projected by international media.
• In Colombia, studies show that increased kidnapping indices significantly reduce health tourism traffic. While exact numbers are not always quantified, the correlation is clear and statistically supported.
• On the U.S.-Mexico border, increased cartel violence has been linked to a 30–35% decline in hotel occupancy and a 10.4% drop in overall border tourism, which includes medical visits.
• In Brazil, a 1% increase in the homicide rate correlates with a reduction of more than 2,000 tourists, with Rio de Janeiro losing up to 3–4 tourists per violent death reported.

Although most of the research focuses on general tourism, medical and health tourism follow similar patterns, especially as these travelers often make choices based on safety, cleanliness, and trust.

Summarized Themes from the Literature

Perceived risk often exceeds actual risk

Tourists tend to overestimate threats based on media exposure, government travel advisories, and anecdotal accounts. In Ciudad Juárez and other high-crime areas, this "perception gap" leads to lower tourist numbers, even though the actual risk within tourist zones may be minimal.

Media and travel alerts may amplify risk

Government warnings and media sensationalism often amplify isolated incidents, leading to widespread cancellations. This is especially problematic for health and medical tourists who plan travel in advance and are more risk-averse due to their health status.

Spatial segregation of violence and tourism

Many cities, like Mazatlán or Rio de Janeiro, feature pockets of security where most health tourists stay. Nonetheless, the presence of nearby crime zones contributes to the overall sense of danger and complicates marketing efforts.

Resilience of some destinations

Some destinations, such as Mexico demonstrate resilience, with violence affecting arrivals but not length of stay, or with certain segments (such as ”dark tourism”) attracting visitors despite security concerns.

What Facilities Can Do: Safety

International healthcare facilities can attract more medical tourists by actively prioritizing and enhancing safety across every stage of the patient journey. This includes implementing visible security protocols, coordinating safe transportation and accommodation, and ensuring medical areas are located within secure, well-monitored zones. By collaborating with local authorities, offering real-time safety updates, and training staff in emergency preparedness and culturally competent care, facilities can provide reassurance to patients concerned about regional instability or crime. A proactive approach to safety not only protects patients but also strengthens trust, improves reputation, and positions the facility as a reliable destination in a competitive global market. Below, find some other specific recommendations:

Strategic Communication and Transparency

·       Facilities must actively manage perceptions. This includes:

• Clear information on safety measures and security protocols
• Real-time updates on regional security
• Testimonials from past international patients

Infrastructure and Geographic Planning

·       Locating facilities within established safe zones (such as close to airports, upscale hotels, and police presence) can help build confidence

·       Collaboration with local authorities for enhanced patrols and visibility also contributes to perceived safety

Collaboration with Travel and Insurance Partners

·       Partnering with travel agencies, insurers, and medical facilitators can provide a broader safety net

·       Also include emergency planning, secure transportation, and vetted accommodation options

Reputation Management

·       Engage in reputation-building efforts, to help proactively counterbalance negative regional news, such as:

• third-party accreditations
• international awards
• affiliations with international hospitals

Destination Branding with Emphasis on Safety and Quality

·       Highlighting unique treatment offerings

·       Posting patient success stories

·       Utilize facility accreditations to help shift the narrative from fear to value

Leverage Digital Media for Real-Time Engagement

·       Promote on online or cellular app platforms like WhatsApp, Instagram, and Facebook

·       Offer virtual tours to engage with potential patients

·       Use digital tools to instantly respond to safety concerns

Quality Assurance in Health Tourism

At its core, quality assurance involves implementing systematic processes to monitor, evaluate, and improve the standard of care. For international patients, these systems translate into tangible indicators of safety and professionalism. Third-party accreditations, such as those from Joint Commission International (JCI), the International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua), or national medical tourism boards, serve as globally recognized endorsements that the facility meets or exceeds international healthcare standards. These certifications are often used by international facilitators and insurers as a prerequisite for referrals and can appear in patients' decision-making shortlists when comparing providers across countries.

Beyond accreditation, QA initiatives can be made patient-facing and marketable. This includes showcasing key performance indicators (KPIs) such as surgical success rates, infection control outcomes, readmission statistics, and patient satisfaction scores. When shared transparently—through brochures, websites, or social media—such metrics help reassure potential medical tourists who may otherwise hesitate due to unfamiliarity with local regulatory systems. Transparent reporting builds credibility and positions the facility as a trustworthy choice amid global competition.

Facilities can also align QA strategies with international patient expectations by adopting culturally responsive care standards. This may involve multilingual staff, patient liaisons trained in cross-border care coordination, dietary accommodations, and pre-/post-treatment communication protocols that reflect global best practices. These service design elements not only improve the patient experience (PX) but also demonstrate an ongoing commitment to excellence and patient-centered care.

Strategically, QA also strengthens institutional resilience in the face of reputational risk-particularly in countries facing media scrutiny over violence or political instability. In such cases, foreign patients often seek assurance that the care environment is highly controlled, sterile, and shielded from external risks. Quality assurance measures like:

·       Standardized protocols

·       Electronic medical records (EMRs)

·       Well-documented infection prevention policies

·       Crisis readiness plans

The message to patients becomes clear- even if broader conditions are volatile, your clinical journey is safe, predictable, and professionally managed.

Marketing QA as a competitive advantage also extends to forming partnerships with travel insurers, employer health plans, and international referral agencies. These stakeholders require assurance that sending patients abroad won’t result in liability, reputational harm, or substandard outcomes. Facilities with independently validated QA systems are more likely to be integrated into these global referral networks, which can substantially boost patient inflow.

Moreover, facilities should integrate QA into their patient testimonials and case studies. Featuring stories that highlight not just successful outcomes but also the efficiency, cleanliness, responsiveness, and professionalism of the process can humanize the QA message and make it more relatable. This is particularly powerful when testimonials come from patients of diverse national backgrounds, reinforcing the message that the facility is equipped to meet international expectations.

What Facilities Can Do: QA

Here are a number of specific and actionable quality assurance (QA) recommendations for owners/operators of medical tourism facilities looking to improve care quality and attract more international patients:

Obtain International Accreditation

• Pursue certification from globally recognized QA bodies
• These endorsements serve as powerful marketing tools and reassure foreign patients of safety and quality standards

Establish and Publicize Clinical Performance Metrics

• Regularly monitor and publish key quality indicators such as:
• Surgical success and complication rates
• Infection rates and hospital-acquired infections (HAIs)
• Readmission and recovery times
• Patient satisfaction scores
• Display them transparently on websites and patient brochures to build trust

Implement Standardized Protocols and SOPs

• Develop clear, standardized clinical and operational protocols aligned with international best practices (e.g., WHO Safe Surgery Checklist, ISO standards)
• Conduct regular audits and internal QA reviews to ensure compliance

Train Multidisciplinary Teams in QA Processes

• Provide ongoing training to all staff (including clinical and administrative) on:
• Quality control procedures
• Infection control
• Cultural sensitivity and patient engagement
• Emergency and disaster response protocols

Create a Dedicated Quality Management Team

• Appoint a QA officer or team responsible for monitoring, reporting, and improving quality across departments
• Include representation from nursing, medical, admin, and patient liaison teams

Establish a Patient Feedback and Complaint Resolution System

• Use multilingual surveys and follow-up interviews to gather feedback
• Track and analyze complaints systematically and implement changes based on trends
• Publicly respond to reviews where appropriate (e.g., on Google, medical tourism platforms like JetPatient)

Offer Transparent Pre- and Post-Treatment Communication

• Develop pre-arrival patient education packages with clear expectations about outcomes, risks, and aftercare
• Ensure robust post-treatment follow-up protocols including telehealth check-ins, especially for international patients

Integrate Digital QA Tools

• Use electronic medical records (EMRs) and incident reporting software to track quality metrics
• Analyze trends to identify and fix root causes of adverse events or inefficiencies

Conduct Regular Risk Assessments

• Perform quarterly clinical risk assessments to identify potential patient safety threats
• Simulate emergency scenarios (e.g., code blue, patient evacuation) and evaluate staff readiness

Promote QA Credentials in Marketing and Partnerships

• Highlight certifications, quality indicators, and patient testimonials in all promotional material
• Share QA data with insurers, facilitators, and employer partners to strengthen referral networks

By implementing these QA practices, facilities not only improve patient outcomes and safety but also build a trusted brand capable of competing globally in the medical tourism sector.

Conclusion

This white paper helps facilities pursuing medical tourism by examining both the impacts on safety and quality on patient opinions and giving some proven strategies to implement at their organization. In summary:

Violence significantly influences medical and health tourism by shaping perceptions of safety more than actual risk. While crime cannot always be eliminated, its impact can be mitigated through proactive strategies, clear communication, and collaboration with local and international partners.

In regard to quality assurance (QA), it should not be seen merely as an internal process but as a public-facing, strategic pillar of international patient acquisition. Facilities that consistently monitor and communicate their commitment to excellence are better positioned to differentiate themselves in a crowded medical tourism market.

Overall Recommendations:

• Invest in strategic communication and transparency.
• Locate in or near high-security, high-trust zones.
• Collaborate with security services and international travel facilitators.
• Embrace accreditation and global affiliations to build trust.
• Support policy initiatives aimed at enhancing regional safety.
• Start on quality improvement projects immediately
• Communicate your quality initiatives on various patient-facing channels

By understanding and addressing the effects of violence and perceptions of quality on tourism, health facility owners can continue to attract and serve international clients even amid challenging contexts. Medical tourism facilities that address these can build confidence not only among patients but also among intermediaries, insurers, and regulators, creating a stable foundation for long-term growth in cross-border healthcare delivery.

About the Author

Dr. David George Vequist IV is one of the foremost global authorities in medical, health, wellness, and retirement tourism. He has been a speaker, researcher, author, and often sought-after thought leader on this topic in the media for nearly two decades now. His academic and applied work on this industry has been impactful in developing strategies for countries, facilities, and policies worldwide. Although he is primarily known as an academic leader of the premier institute examining the movement of patients across borders, both domestically and internationally, in addition, Dr. Vequist has been a consultant, Fortune 500 executive, and entrepreneur.

References

• Alvira, G., & Tatiana, L. (2016). Cómo afecta el factor peligrosidad en el turista que visita Colombia.
• Antošová, G., Santos, L. L., & Stradová, S. (2020). Perception of safety tourism in Colombia. Advances in Tourism, Technology and Systems.
• Bonilla Rubiano, J. M., & Moreno González, M. M. (2010). Determinantes de la demanda de turismo en Colombia 2004–2007: Seguridad, comercio y otros factores.
• Carballo, R. R., Carballo, M. M., León, C. J., & Moreno Gil, S. (2021). La percepción del riesgo y su implicación en la gestión y promoción de los destinos turísticos. El efecto moderador del destino. Cuadernos de Turismo.
• Cîntăreţu, V. (2019). Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) effects on tourists’ perceptions towards a destination: The case study of Colombia and dark tourism.
• Corona, N. (2018). Does violent crime scare tourists away? Panel data evidence from 32 Mexican states. EconoQuantum.
• Costa, J. H., & González Herrera, M. G. (2020). Criminalidad, seguridad pública y turismo en la zona fronteriza de Ciudad Juárez, México.
• Crosby, J. (2010). Swine flu, drug wars, and riots: Media and tourism in Oaxaca, Mexico.
• Cruz-Milán, O. (2021). Hotels' marketing mix responses at insecurity-stricken destinations: A study in the US–Mexico border. International Hospitality Review.
• Cruz-Milán, O., & Castillo-Ortiz, I. (2023). Destination brand personality self-congruity and crime perceptions: Effects on travel intentions. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management.
• Flores Gamboa, S., Jiménez, J., & Santiesteban, M. L. (2018). Influjo de las alertas de viaje en un contexto de inseguridad internacional: El caso de Mazatlán, Sinaloa (México).
• Flores Gamboa, S., Mariño Jiménez, J. P., Santiesteban, M. L., & Liz, A. del P. (2016). Percepción de seguridad del turismo extranjero que arriba en casas rodantes a playas de Mazatlán (Sinaloa).
• Hernández-Estrada, D. G., Delgado-Cruz, A., & Palmas-Castrejón, Y. (2021). Motivaciones e intención de visita frente a la situación de inseguridad por el narcotráfico. Estudio de las percepciones del turista de Mazatlán, México. CienciaUAT.
• Lanuza, A., Rodríguez, R. G., & Ortega, J. O. (2017). Estado y percepción de políticas de seguridad turística en destinos patrimoniales mexicanos.
• Laure Vidriales, A. (2020). Fake news or real: Analysis of the impact of travel alerts in Mexico’s sun and sea main tourist destinations. Journal of Travel, Tourism and Recreation.
• López, F., & Marcelo, J. (2017). Excursionismo internacional y secuestros en la frontera de México, 1997–2016.
• Lutz, B. J., & Lutz, J. (2018). Terrorism and tourism in the Caribbean: A regional analysis. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression.
• Lutz, J., & Lutz, B. J. (2006). International terrorism in Latin America: Effects on foreign investment and tourism.
• Machado, M. (2018). Factores restrictivos del turismo: La percepción de la demanda real y potencial sobre la seguridad pública en Rio de Janeiro (Brasil).
• Montes, G., & de Pinho Bernabé, S. (2020). The impact of violence on tourism to Rio de Janeiro.
• Osuna, N. I. P. (2017). La violencia del narcotráfico como factor exógeno que impide el éxito de las redes de políticas: El caso del turismo de cruceros en Mazatlán, Sinaloa.
• Rejowski, M. (2005). Criminalidade e turismo em São Paulo, Brasil: A violência registrada junto aos turistas estrangeiros.
• Sanches, A., Arruda, D. de O., & Mariani, M. (2021). Análise da relação entre os indicadores de homicídios e a chegada de turistas estrangeiros no Brasil. Dilemas: Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social.
• Santiesteban, M., & Flores Gamboa, S. (2019). The effects of crime on tourism: A multiple regression analysis.
• Vequist, Pulido, & Vequist (In Press) The Impact of Violence and Crime on Medical Tourism in Mexico: Impact of Crime on Medical Tourism in Mexico